I’ve been having an interesting experience this week putting out the rubbish. Swansea Council has been encouraging its residents to recycle, and has made further improvements by allowing the recycling of cardboard recently. So there I am, filling recycling bags with a mountain of cat food boxes (it’s only now that I realise just how much my cat eats!) feeling good about being green. My small contribution to solving a very big problem.
Moving to another recycling theme, I know there has been some pressure in the medical community for the adoption of the concept of “implied consent” for the donation of organs after death. After all, there is a worldwide shortage of donors and no prospect of improvement in the situation. A recent UK poll showed a large majority of people in favour of organ donation. However, there is a relatively small proportion of the population that carry the card showing active consent to the donation of organs after death. It is hoped that implied consent will make more organs available for transplantation.
I certainly agree with the concept, though over 30 years of Type 1 Diabetes has made most of my organs useless for donation. As one in three diabetics will develop kidney disease, as a group we are very grateful recipients of the process, but are unable to reciprocate because of the internal damage this disease causes to our own bodies. There was an item on ABC news in the USA recently adding to the gloom. It is common knowledge that our condition can damage our sight, but now there is evidence that diabetics could experience twice the level of hearing loss of the general population. Hey, ho, …. fight the good fight!
On a much more positive note, the work on stem cells promises much for chronic conditions like diabetes. These cells will eventually, I hope, allow the body to regenerate. This, along with other promising therapies, such as a Patient’s Recovery from Terminal Skin Cancer reported today (thanks to the Daily Telegraph), offer something for most of us.
Unfortunately, on a personal note, I wish to mark the imminent passing of a wonderful human being from this world to the next. Such regenerative therapies are coming too late to save her from secondary cancer, but she definitely fought the good fight.



In the Eye of the Beholder
June 25, 2008I heard yesterday that my favourite painting, Monet’s Water Lily Pond, was sold at auction for £41 million, which I think works out at around $80 million at the current exchange rate. Perhaps art really is recession-proof! There were certainly 11 people bidding who felt so…
Noteworthy from my perspective is the fact that Monet painted this work in 1919 when his sight was seriously impaired by cataracts. When he had them removed in 1921 and looked at the work again, he didn’t like it.
I am certainly grateful, as a fan of this soft-focussed piece of art, that he didn’t destroy it. Is it possible to say that Claude Monet’s Impressionism was a consequence of his visual disabilities? Am I, what I do, how I react, a consequence of my multiple disabilities too? That is a great philosophical conundrum, and I’d love to know what the answer is. It is more than likely that my life would have been different if I didn’t have a disability, but whether for good or ill, who can tell – maybe I’ll give it more thought and come back to it another time.
Posted in Comments on the News, Disability Issues | Tagged auction, disability, Monet, philosophy, visual impairment | Leave a Comment »